Mon premier blog

Build Your Own .NET Language and Compiler Edward G. Nilges
Publisher: Apress

In that spirit, I would like to re-make the argument for Guile as the GNU extension language. These browsers You can have all the new syntax you want for your browser scripts, right now, if you write in another source language and compile to the ECMAScript 3 dialect of JavaScript for the billions of browsers in the wild. The w3schools site shows 7.7% and Net Market Share shows 18.2%. The C++ standard library follows NVI nearly universally, and other modern OO languages and environments have rediscovered this principle for their own library design guidelines, such as in the .NET Framework Design Guidelines. I thought to make a new language very similar to some popular one, and thus eliminating the need of having 2 compilers…. Obviously, that What I'd like to see is a more modular way of building compilers, so that integrating a small language feature like classbox would be a small amount of effort. If you would like to use specialized syntax for the general idioms like those shown above or you would like syntax for your own idioms, what can you do? I've typically resorted to rolling my own but that's obviously not practical in many cases. URL: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/0k6kkbsd.aspx. It compiles any valid source fileinto a valid .NET console executable. The language is currently in under development. My presentation deals with this issue at length, but a nice summary can be found in the Guile manual: this freedom covers modifying and rebuilding the C code; but if the program also provides an extension language, that is usually a much friendlier and lower-barrier-of-entry way for the user to start making their own changes. .NET Classbox introduces a new syntax for “using” to C# – basically, you can use individual classes as well as whole namespaces, and you can extend the individual classes you use. So, you will have to develop your own console for that. This executable also requires .NET 4.0. If you write override but there is no matching base class function, or you write final and a further-derived class tries to implicitly or explicitly override the function anyway, you get a compile-time error. Microsoft's own build tool – if you're using visual studio, you're already using MSBuild. Automatic tools (LEX and This compiler is programmed in C#, and requires .NET Framework 4.0 to work. Why care about extension languages?